The Hospitality of Keigo Oyamada
By the way, I am an opponent of the Olympics.
The performance of Yuriko Koike drinking raw water from Tokyo Bay at the press conference was necessary for the Olympics to be held. I am such an opponent of the Olympics that I still think so.
The opposition to the Olympics and the criticism of Keigo Oyamada seem to be surprisingly unspoken about.
I would like to leave some thoughts on how Keigo Oyamada was used by the opponents of the Olympics.
What was the opposition to the Olympics?
As we all know, the opposition to the Olympics was very loud in the summer of 2021. I remember it was about 50/50 for and against the Olympics. At the very least, public opinion was not in favor of the Olympics. The corona scourge had put a strain on hospital beds. Vaccinations for the working-age population were delayed. Forced self-restraint. The contradiction of holding the event in such a situation. Rather than being opposed to the event from a political standpoint, they were probably opposed to it considering the actual situation at the time.
However, it was a convenient way for those who gained from criticizing the administration. Just by saying they were against the Olympics, they could easily get exposure where the public was listening. It’s not a very useful weapon, though. Remember, the Paralympics are coming after the Olympics. If you are against the Tokyo 2020 Olympics, are you also against the Paralympics? That’s the question. If you continue to oppose the Olympics, you will be pointed out as such. There were opponents who were against the Olympics, but said they would enjoy the games once they were held. That is the true nature of this mysterious movement.
In fact, opposition to the Olympics can only be used to that extent.
Opposition to the Olympics and Keigo Oyamada, and their uses
At the time, the act of criticizing Keigo Oyamada was overwhelmingly justified. What would people think of you if you didn’t criticize him? I think there was definitely such pressure. It was a test that was being conducted regardless of the Olympics.
As an opponent of the Olympics (I am an opponent of the Tokyo 2020 Olympics), Keigo Oyamada was very “useful” in raising the voice of opposition to the Olympics. It is surprisingly difficult to raise one’s voice in opposition. I have to be very careful to make it look like I am standing on the side of justice, to avoid legal reprimand, to be easy to read, and to have social significance. I hope you are surprised.
More often than not, complaints are made, not opposing voices. But even in a complaint, evil is always necessary. If there is no evil, there can be no justice, and if there is no justice, the abuse cannot become the voice of opposition. Keigo Oyamada’s problem was useful in securing this justice.
To put it bluntly, the word “bullying” is all that is needed. Even “Keigo Oyamada” is enough. And it is easy to use.
For example.
“No to the Olympics! Create a false image of the Olympics as a legacy and expand the concessions. Thorough anti-bullying measures!”
I don’t know what I’m saying, but it sounds plausible, doesn’t it?
Furthermore.
“The organizing committee should take responsibility and resign immediately for thoughtlessly appointing Keigo Oyamada!
This only says that the organizing committee should quit. However, just by mentioning Keigo Oyamada, it seems to be referring to human rights issues. This just makes it seem very righteous (personal opinion).
Even with such empty sentences, the mere mention of “bullying” and “Keigo Oyamada” makes them seem to have social significance. Just by using these words, it became a righteous sentence that points out against various problems. I hope you can understand why “Keigo Oyamada” is so easy to use.
A deepening evil
For many opponents of the Olympics, Keigo Oyamada was simply a tool for criticizing the Olympics, nothing more and nothing less. At the same time, in order to use him better as a tool, he was subjected to punitive attention. It is even grotesque in writing. I also had such an interest.
The problem is that every time “Oyamada Keigo” is used in this way, nothing about “Oyamada Keigo” has changed, but its malignancy deepens. For example, three people say, “The Olympics involving Keigo Oyamada is shameful. Then, three righteous voices will point out that Keigo Oyamada is evil. I think there was this negative effect. I also used “Keigo Oyamada” a few times. I apologize for that.
Hating on Keigo Oyamada
For most opponents of the Olympics, they don’t have much of an emotional attachment to Keigo Oyamada, and are close to indifferent (in the sense that they don’t care what happens), which seems to have been the reality.
Does this seem surprising to you?
Or are you satisfied with the fact that you thought it would be something like that?
I wonder if the criticism of Keigo Oyamada by opponents of the Olympics will continue after the Olympics are over. The topic of the Olympics is now old, and the good that can be gained by criticizing Oyamada Keigo has already been almost exhausted. It would be better to RT Pluto’s time report.
Now that the Olympics are over, I think the people who hate Keigo Oyamada are the ones in favor of the Olympics. He gave them material to criticize the Olympics. From the perspective of the pro-Olympics group, I can imagine the hatred. Whether they think so or not, I don’t know the truth.
You can look at it this way.
Naoki Inose, you may be wondering why this name comes up. He promoted the active use of the Imperial Family in order to bid for the Olympics. Each citizen may have his or her own personal feelings about the pros and cons, but using the imperial family is not a sin. And of course, using the Imperial Family strengthens the relationship between the Imperial Family and Tokyo 2020.
Looking at the results alone, the imperial family has been involved in the “poop backdrop. There must have been many citizens who could not tolerate this.
In fact, I had my doubts about the use of the Imperial Family in the opaque bid process and the commercial use of the Imperial Family. On top of that, there was a series of ugly news. I was dismayed that the poop backdrop was so awful.
…And a triathlon held in poop-contaminated water.
Does it have to end in poop?
